Authentic News with Jim Fetzer, November 3, 2023 Hour 2

Glad you mentioned the Fields guy who is currently in prison for ramming his Dodge Charger into a blockade during the Charlottesville incident, which caused an overweight woman to die of a heart attack. You said another driver did the deed. I think Fields did it but he was being chased and intimidated by Intifada Marxist types, and it was an accident as opposed to a deliberate act. It is a great injustice that he has been found guilty of a crime and imprisoned. We should raise the issue of his innocence and get him out of prison.

Turkey, Algeria, Yemn, they are al weak sisters making a bit of noise because they are paid off to make noise. No one is really defying zionville in the slaughter of Palestine. No one.

1. At timestamp 49:35, Dave comments further on Jim’s Pretrib Rapture exposure which is very a-biblical.

2. At timestamp 51:15, Dave reads a bit of the following commentary on the frequent Scientific Low Level in the altmedia.

Thu, Nov 2 at 11:05 PM

Dave, et al –

This whole non-virus meme has, more than any other indication, the markings of a psy-op. As for the scientific issue itself, the definition is far less important than the simple fact that there is a non-bacterial mode of infection that:

a] cases pathology in a number of instances,

b] exhibits nonlinear propagation – i.e. contagion, characteristic of a biologic replication mechanism that, according to long established institutional verification, and certainly medical practise. and,

c] is involved in likewise contagious biologic processes for social engineering, as evidenced by the massively flagrant and diverse censorship and malfeasance of medical and domestic policy at all levels. The issue subject to diversion of our precious time and resources to resist an unprecedented institutionalised violation of the public trust, is the biologic weapon and its complex of ultimate purposes – a solution – not a nebulous, intractable treatment of the precise mechanics of its propagation – an obfuscation.

This latter aspect can be arbitrarily called into question as a conspiracy at a broad institutional level, but by the same token requires equally extraordinary evidence, and in the face of Occam’s razor explaining well established etiologies, that is generally far beyond the scope of a non-professional in biological sciences and medicine, let alone a half-baked collage of altmedia speculation and arguably dubious journalism, fading potentially to yellow. Any theoretical suite of approaches suggesting a radical alternative to viruses, in the face of long established practise, must include the extraordinary evidence of collusion and conspiracy, as well as an explanation for why the distinction even necessarily matters if the new description of the pathogenesis carries precisely the same properties observed with what we regard as “viruses.”

If anything, the anti-virus meme destroys the ability to trace the operations to modify the planetary populations, based upon highly sophisticated methods to manipulate the genetics and their pathological properties relative, in particular, to population control. A synthetic conspiracy then becomes an obfuscation for the real one. The proponents of these biologic weapons sure have a powerful and precise suite of methods for something based upon a radically faulty notion…..

In the absence of a superlative technical revelation, these anti-virus proponents are most likely either sincerely credulous dupes, or else are being drafted as part of a deception. Once again….. the altmedia is monumentally unprepared to address a technical phenomenon at this level, as they cannot even find sensible common ground on organically simple scientific discussions. Until this is demonstrably resolved, there is no point in taking the bait on circuitous nonsense, driven by a mixture of both naive sincerity and sub-rosa processes, in a forum that sometimes cannot even resolve a distraction antagonising the question of whether the planet is round or flat. Even [Redacted], to my sincere disappointment, dodged the prospect, and public benefit, of a deeper and more integrated discussion of his field, and although he is a rare example of a cause celeb at personal expense, the vast majority of the altmedia field is a vastly profitable shunt for controversy, with little resolution for actual solutions to our dilemmas. It is I who, some years ago, coined the term “altmedia” as a shorthand in all of the discussions and writings I offered, but no one realises this except the author, nor do they express any desire to embrace the deeper process that would ultimately lend itself to competent collaboration toward solutions – an independent brain trust serving as a natural and crucial alternative, a non-institutionalised peer review process. I have insisted and still insist, that operating on the lowest common denominator is NOT the proper approach to public enlightenment, or any effective form of activism. Even Oppenheimer maintained this process and collaborative atmosphere at Los Alamos, at great strain to his relationship with Groves. Besides, the amateur show is damn boring, and is really an insult to truth at a time when it is in the gravest danger. This is not to say that the non-vial propositions should not be discussed – but not as if they are established fact to create sensationalism and, intentionally or not, confusion and operational obfuscation regarding the far more critical issues to be resolved. We are facing a massive calamity for want of the truth, and that, by widely different causes.

S
11-2-23

Dave adds:
Please note, that Stadtmiller poo pooed the idea of Peer Review in the Classic and replayed call I made to him during the relatively early parts of the Pandemic – replayed by Kary & Paul CA on their “Ditch Dave” show as I will call it all on Dave NY (the guy who spoke some intelligent sense on this issue). And more recently by Paul CA on his Oct 9 Fetzer Show where Paul demonstrated that by looking only at the information and rhetoric presented by the “No Virus” folks, he was convinced they were correct. He ADMITTED to looking at only one side of the argument. Certainly it is simpler to do that, since they only have a few articles published, vs 1.5 million Peer Reviewed Scientific articles on Viruses found in PubMed. !! These folks have IN NO WAY Rebutted probably ANY of these 1.5 million papers.

It is not that other factors may also be present in the Covid Disease than merely SarsCov2, certainly because of misassignment of deaths in certain cases. It is all designed, IMO, to engender Confusion in the Public. This is EXACTLY what we have seen propagated in the Altmedia. — poorly researched or thought through suppositional conclusions, evidencing the Low Science IQ of the US Public. The folks coming up with these Half-Baked ideas or propagating them, ARE RESPONSIBLE for the spread of such misinformation. THEY DID NON THINK. It is NOT my fault, THEY did not think. Then they rejected rational thought presented by myself and a few others, to step off the Cliff.