John Stadtmiller’s The National Intel Report with Special Hosts, December 13, 2022 Hour 2
By RBN
Related Articles
Podcast: Play in new window | Download
Subscribe: RSS
Host: Michael Herzog, of The American Awakening, with guest, Jessica Clowers | I’m Growing Rather Fond of the Wand
Michael and Jessica discuss healing via use of frequencies.
By RBN
Write a comment
8 Comments
View comments
What kind of wands are these and where do I get them?
We’ll have all the information posted shortly… please, be patient and feel free to call the office here at RBN: 800-724-2719 ext. 3 for more information.
In fact, you may want to contact Michael Herzog immediately to take advantage of the current offer.
discerner12000@yahoo.com
In fact, the following are some studies indicating dangers from THz wave exposure. Do you think the source of these in China were aware of another trojan horse ? Think Twice as a Sapien
Is it any big deal to produce phosphorylated proteins indicative of DNA damage, to cause DNA strand breaks, to Unzip DNA, to possibly release cancer stem cells (remember, instructions say do not use on cancer – how do you know if you have cancer cells forming ?), disrupt proteins in living cells, reprogram mammalian stem cells, alter gene activity in stem cells, etc.
.https://www.technologyreview.com/2009/10/30/208491/how-terahertz-waves-tear-apart-dna/https://www.riken.jp/en/news_pubs/research_news/pr/2020/20200602_2/https://sdgln.com/health/2022/12/14/cancer-stem-cells-relation-tumor-biology/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21209821/https://www.eurekalert.org/news-releases/701026
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S258900422200236X
Some of your links are pasted together… and your stories seem to be mostly ‘promising’ for ailments, including cancer. Thanks, Dave.
Let’s use a little Peer Review from scientists to determine whether these articles are Mostly promising for aliments including cancer. You be the judge.
First we should discover whether Cancer Stem Cells (CSCs) promote cancer growth or destruction.
We can take a look at the following information in a review article.
Cancer stem cells: A brief review of the current status
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30268439/
Which states in the abstract:
“Cancer stem cells (CSCs) comprise the subpopulation of tumor bulk and acquire resistant to conventional therapies and are considered as the primary tumor initiator cells. Nowadays, the tumor heterogeneity originated from CSCs, and its progenitors are accepted as a mortifying drawback in front of the cancer therapies. ”
Now, the above statements might not be clear to those not familiar with this specialized field of science. So:
Reading from the Harvard Stem Cell Institute:
“They may in fact be the source of some, and possibly most cancers. Lurking somewhere within every tumor, some say, are a few stem cells that have lost their genetic marbles, so to speak – continuously supplying a malignant mass with cancerous cells.”
Now, the above more clearly states that cancer stem cells provide a source of tumor cells.
https://hsci.harvard.edu/stem-cells-and-cancer
The above references are mainstream accepted ideas in science and biochemistry. If you object to the term “mainstream”, here it means merely that a plethora of evidence has been amassed and analyzed by many scientists who conclude that the above paradigm is true. But if one does not like to consider the opinions of highly trained scientists with a massive body of data and evidence, would one then simply propose some other ideas without supporting evidence (i.e., without reason) ?
Erica Khan further stated in her 12/16/22 presentation that Cancer Stem Cells are particularly resistant to treatment. See:
https://mediaarchives.gsradio.net/rense/special/rense_121622_hr2.mp3
Where she states that IF stem cells are produced by this device, they MAY be mobilizing and seeding cancer or deformed organs (see 17:30 minutes in). This is Erica’s interpretation and her peer review.
In the following article,
Mammalian stem cells reprogramming in response to terahertz radiation
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21209821/
The abstract ends:
We propose that THz radiation is a potential tool for cellular reprogramming.
Really, reprogramming. Sounds like Moderna’s rewriting the genetic code.
Terahertz zaps alter gene activity in stem cells
https://www.eurekalert.org/news-releases/701026
“Terahertz light pulses change gene expression in stem cells”
It does not say that any of these alterations are positive.
This is playing Russian Roulette on your body. Good luck.
The major concern is whether there are short- and / or long-term negative effects of wand use, and how severe they are. Any dangers are not clear at this point.
Let’s use a little Peer Review from scientists to determine whether these articles are Mostly promising for aliments including cancer. You be the judge.
First we should discover whether Cancer Stem Cells (CSCs) promote cancer growth or destruction.
We can take a look at the following information in a review article.
Cancer stem cells: A brief review of the current status
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30268439/
Which states in the abstract:
“Cancer stem cells (CSCs) comprise the subpopulation of tumor bulk and acquire resistant to conventional therapies and are considered as the primary tumor initiator cells. Nowadays, the tumor heterogeneity originated from CSCs, and itsprogenitors are accepted as a mortifying drawback in front of the cancer therapies. ”
Now, the above statements might not be clear to those not familiar with this specialized field of science. So:
Reading from the Harvard Stem Cell Institute:
“They may in fact be the source of some, and possibly most cancers. Lurking somewhere within every tumor, some say, are a few stem cells that have lost their genetic marbles, so to speak – continuously supplying a malignant mass with cancerous cells.”
Now, the above more clearly states that cancer stem cells provide a source of tumor cells.
https://hsci.harvard.edu/stem-cells-and-cancer
The above references are mainstream accepted ideas in science and biochemistry. The term “mainstream”, here it means merely that a plethora of evidence has been amassed and analyzed by many scientists who conclude that the above paradigm is true. But if one does not like to consider the opinions of highly trained scientists with a massive body of data and evidence, would one then simply propose some other ideas without supporting evidence (i.e., without reason) ?
Erica Khan further stated in her 12/16/22 presentation that Cancer Stem Cells are particularly resistant to treatment. she states that IF stem cells are produced by this device, they MAY be mobilizing and seeding cancer or deformed organs (see 17:30 minutes in). This is Erica’s interpretation and her peer review.
In the following article,
Mammalian stem cells reprogramming in response to terahertz radiation
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21209821/
The abstract ends:
We propose that THz radiation is a potential tool for cellular reprogramming.
Really, reprogramming. Sounds like Moderna’s rewriting the genetic code.
Terahertz zaps alter gene activity in stem cells
https://www.eurekalert.org/news-releases/701026
“Terahertz light pulses change gene expression in stem cells”
It does not say that any of these alterations are positive.
This is playing Russian Roulette on your body. Good luck.
Let’s use a little Peer Review from scientists to determine whether these articles are Mostly promising for aliments including cancer. You be the judge.
First we should discover whether Cancer Stem Cells (CSCs) promote cancer growth or destruction.
We can take a look at the following information in a review article.
Cancer stem cells: A brief review of the current status
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30268439/
Which states in the abstract:
“Cancer stem cells (CSCs) comprise the subpopulation of tumor bulk and acquire resistant to conventional therapies and are considered as the primary tumor initiator cells. Nowadays, the tumor heterogeneity originated from CSCs, and its progenitors are accepted as a mortifying drawback in front of the cancer therapies. ”
Now, the above statements might not be clear to those not familiar with this specialized field of science. So:
Reading from the Harvard Stem Cell Institute:
“They may in fact be the source of some, and possibly most cancers. Lurking somewhere within every tumor, some say, are a few stem cells that have lost their genetic marbles, so to speak – continuously supplying a malignant mass with cancerous cells.”
Now, the above more clearly states that cancer stem cells provide a source of tumor cells.
https://hsci.harvard.edu/stem-cells-and-cancer
The above references are mainstream accepted ideas in science and biochemistry. If you object to the term “mainstream”, here it means merely that a plethora of evidence has been amassed and analyzed by many scientists who conclude that the above paradigm is true. But if one does not like to consider the opinions of highly trained scientists with a massive body of data and evidence, would one then simply propose some other ideas without supporting evidence (i.e., without reason) ?
Erica Khan further stated in her 12/16/22 presentation that Cancer Stem Cells are particularly resistant to treatment. See:
https://mediaarchives.gsradio.net/rense/special/rense_121622_hr2.mp3
Where she states that IF stem cells are produced by this device, they MAY be mobilizing and seeding cancer or deformed organs (see 17:30 minutes in). This is Erica’s interpretation and her peer review.
In the following article,
Mammalian stem cells reprogramming in response to terahertz radiation
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21209821/
The abstract ends:
We propose that THz radiation is a potential tool for cellular reprogramming.
Really, reprogramming. Sounds like Moderna’s rewriting the genetic code.
Terahertz zaps alter gene activity in stem cells
https://www.eurekalert.org/news-releases/701026
“Terahertz light pulses change gene expression in stem cells”
It does not say that any of these alterations are positive.
This is playing Russian Roulette on your body. Good luck.