National Bugle Radio with Patrick Slattery 08.04.23
By RBN
Related Articles
Podcast: Play in new window | Download
Subscribe: RSS
Dr. Duke joins the show for an extra funky and soulful update on adverse reactions from Covid mRNA shots. Ohhhh yeahhhh!!!!
By RBN
Write a comment
6 Comments
View comments
As always, a fine show from this host.
At one point, Slattery and Duke seemed to be saying that although the ZOG system lies to us about Covid, it tells the truth about most other things.
Why would the ZOG system ever tell us the truth? Think about your attitude toward cockroaches. Do feel that you have an obligation to be honest with cockroaches? As we feel about cockroaches, so does the ZOG system feel about us.
“AIPAC, ADL run the show here, folks, no doubt about it; they buy off our congress with money, hookers, little boys; anything congress wants for their vote Israel will provide. Our congress is nothing more than a high-priced whorehouse. They are nothing more than streetwalkers, thieves in the night, and killers for hire….” — Phil Tourney, survivor of the U.S.S. Liberty
“If a Jew needs a liver, can you take the liver of an innocent non-Jew passing by to save him? The Torah would probably permit that. Jewish life has an infinite value. There is something infinitely more holy and unique about Jewish life than non-Jewish life.” — Rabbi Yitzhak Ginsburgh
Joel Stein: “Jews totally run Hollywood…. But I don’t care if Americans think we’re running the news media, Hollywood, Wall Street, or the government. I just care that we get to keep running them.”
“They [Jews] created their own America, an America which is not the real America … but ultimately this shadow America becomes so popular and so widely disseminated that its images and its values come to devour the real America. And so the grand irony of all of Hollywood is that Americans come to define themselves by the shadow of America that was created by Eastern European Jewish immigrants….” — the Jew Neil Gabler
The ZOG system lied to us about Pearl Harbor.
The ZOG system lied to us about the Holohoax.
The ZOG system lied to us about the assassination of JFK.
The ZOG system lied to us about the U.S.S. Liberty.
The ZOG system lied to us about MLK.
The ZOG system lied to us about the Apollo program.
The ZOG system lied to us about 9-11 (WTC).
The ZOG system lied to us about Sandy Hoax (Sandy Hook).
The ZOG system lies to us about race and racial differences.
The ZOG system lies to us about negro crime.
The ZOG system lies to us about “White privilege”.
The ZOG system lies to us about the continuing invasion of this country.
The ZOG system lies to us about the “murder” of George Floyd in Minneapolis.
The ZOG system lies to us about the stolen election in 2020.
The ZOG system lies to us about the January 6 “insurrection”.
The ZOG system lies to us about “global warming”.
The ZOG system lies to us about “climate change”.
The ZOG system lies to us about the Covid scamdemic.
The ZOG system lies to us about the Covid kill-shots.
The ZOG system lies to us about the Ukraine.
Why would the ZOG system, which is trying to exterminate the Aryans in this country, ever feel obligated to tell us the truth?
“[T]he broad masses of a nation … more readily fall victims to the big lie than the small lie, since … they would not believe that others could have the impudence to distort the truth so infamously…. From time immemorial, … the Jews have known better than any others how falsehood and calumny can be exploited.” — Adolf Hitler (Mein Kampf; volume 1, chapter 10; Murphy translation)
The truth about the U.S.S. Liberty:
“After twenty-four years, Mr. Porter disclosed the fact that his cryptographic staff in the [American] Embassy at Beirut [in 1967] had intercepted … communications between the commander of the Israeli air squadron and the Israeli High Command, which proved that the latter knew that the Liberty was an unarmed American naval vessel….
“When the Israeli … planes were sent to attack and destroy the ship, the Jewish commander, seeing that it was an American vessel, had misgivings and reported to the High Command, which simply repeated the orders to attack and sink the Liberty.” — Revilo P. Oliver (“A Bit of Good News”; Liberty Bell, Jan. 1992)
Why doesn’t Congress declare war on Israel?
The truth about 9-11 (the demolition of the 3 WTC buildings):
First, three indisputable facts.
1. Steel-framed skyscrapers will not and cannot collapse because of fire. They are designed and constructed to remain standing even when fires are raging.
2. If the government had thought that the three buildings in New York had collapsed because of fire, then the authorities would have carefully examined all of the rubble in order to find out why and to determine the changes that needed to be made to the building codes. Since those in charge knew that fire did not cause the collapse of the buildings, all of the evidence (the rubble) was illegally disposed of as quickly as possible. Most of the large steel beams were shipped to China.
3. Since the wreckage of a jet airliner was not found at the Pentagon, it is certain that a jet airliner did not hit the Pentagon.
On that day, not long after the Twin Towers had been turned to dust, the System told us that they had been brought down by the impact of two airliners and the resulting fires.
The System eventually told us that a total of four planes had been hijacked by passengers with box-cutters, and we were even told the names of the hijackers.
But how did the System know which of the passengers had done the hijacking? Did the hijackers get on the radio, identify themselves, and announce their intentions? No. Did the crews of the planes get on the radio and say that Arab hijackers with box-cutters had taken over? No.
Perhaps the minions of the System examined the passenger lists and said “Aha! Here are some men with Arab names. They must be the hijackers!” No. The names of the men that we are told did the hijackings are not even on those passenger lists. (If their names were not on the passenger lists, then they were not on those airplanes; if they were not on those airplanes, then they did not hijack those airplanes. I hope that this ultra convoluted reasoning isn’t hurting your brain.)
So what did the System present as evidence about the hijackers? Cell-phone calls made by passengers on the planes. However, such calls would have been impossible. At that time in the U.S., a cell-phone tower even had great difficulty handing over to the next tower a call from a phone in an automobile going 70 miles per hour. One of the calls lasted 18 minutes. Later, when it had been amply proven that cell-phone calls could not have been made from airliners, the System amended its lies. It said that the calls were made by airphones, telephones provided by the airlines. Then why did caller-ID show the recipients of the calls that they had come from cell-phones?
A stewardess from one of the planes left a message on her husband’s answering machine. The answering machine showed that the call had been made by her cell-phone. She recited the tale of how the plane had been hijacked, but just before she hung up, she whispered “It’s a frame.”
Since the call was made with her cell-phone, we know that she was on the ground, not in the air. She was being forced by her captors to lie to her husband.
It has been shown that many of the alleged hijackers were still alive after 9-11. That’s rather puzzling, isn’t it? I didn’t know that it was possible for a man who is alive today to have been killed on an earlier day. But if the System says that it is so, then it must be so!
If it is proven that a witness has lied, then all of his testimony becomes completely worthless. Everything that he says becomes worth less than nothing. From that point on, to listen to him with the expectation of hearing some truth is insanely foolish.
We have not heard any audio from the cockpit voice recorders of the four planes that were allegedly hijacked. The Masters tell us that the two recorders from the planes that hit the Twin Towers were never found and that the one found at the Pentagon was so badly damaged that it was unusable. The F.B.I. says that it has the one from that airliner that allegedly crashed in Pennsylvania, but they refuse to let us hear the recording. Aren’t you grateful to the Masters?
In violation of protocol, not a single fighter plane was scrambled to go after the hijacked airliners. We are told that a large plane was allowed to penetrate the most heavily defended airspace in the world on its way to the Pentagon and was not shot down by a missile or even challenged by a fighter plane.
The military commanders who were responsible for protecting New York City and Washington, D.C. on that day were not punished for their malfeasance. Instead, they were all promoted.
The Arab who allegedly flew an airliner into the Pentagon wasn’t even qualified to solo in a single-engine Cessna. We are told that as he was getting close to the Pentagon, he decided that it wouldn’t be very nice to hit the wall of the Pentagon that lay directly ahead of him; so he made an incredible maneuver, a 270-degree turn, that resulted in the plane’s hitting a part of the Pentagon that was undergoing renovation and that contained the fewest employees. (Experts have stated that it would have taken an experienced pilot in a jet fighter many attempts to accomplish that feat.) Like all hijackers, that Arab was extremely sweet and saintly, and he was given superhuman powers by God to enable him to complete his mission.
The type of airplane that allegedly hit the Pentagon had two massive jet engines that were nine feet in diameter and largely constructed of almost indestructible titanium. No such engines were found at the crash site. That fact alone proves beyond a shadow of a doubt that the System is lying.
Where an airplane crashes, airplane wreckage is found. When you find the airplane wreckage, you’ve found where the airplane crashed. The wreckage of a Boeing 757 was not found at the Pentagon. Therefore, a Boeing 757 did not crash at the Pentagon. Anyone who can’t understand that is simple-minded.
Major General Albert Stubblebine: “One of my experiences in the Army was being in charge of the Army’s imagery interpretation…. I look at the hole in the Pentagon, and I look at the size of an airplane that was supposed to have hit the Pentagon: the plane does not fit in that hole. So what did hit the Pentagon?”
Col. George Nelson (Aircraft accident investigator, U.S. Air Force): “With all the evidence readily available at the Pentagon crash site, any unbiased rational investigator could only conclude that a Boeing 757 did not fly into the Pentagon.”
Norman Mineta, Transportation Secretary, in sworn testimony before the 9/11 Commission, described what happened as the aircraft approached the Pentagon: “There was a young man who would come in and say to the Vice President ‘The plane is 50 miles out’, ‘The plane is 30 miles out.’ And when he got down to ‘The plane is 10 miles out’, the young man also said to the Vice President ‘Do the orders still stand?’ and the Vice President … whipped his neck around and said ‘Of course the orders still stand. Have you heard anything to the contrary?'”
It’s obvious that the orders in question were not to shoot down the incoming aircraft.
Mineta’s testimony was omitted from the final “9/11 Commission Report”.
In 2004 the 9/11 Commission interviewed Douglas Cochrane, the young man who said “Do the orders still stand?” Of course, the interview has been withdrawn from public access, and it still remains classified.
The F.B.I. confiscated many tapes from security cameras that showed the aircraft approaching the Pentagon, and then they refused to release them to the public. We were finally given a few frames of video from two cameras that were taken at the moment of approach and impact. However, both cameras had the same point of view, and the frames do not show the aircraft. (The cameras only took one picture per second.) At least one frame had been doctored.
There are well-tested standards that govern the design and construction of skyscrapers. Architects and engineers know about fire. They know about steel and how it is affected by heat. They even know about jet airliners (although the True Believers in the System’s lies find that inconceivable). In fact, each of the twin towers was specifically designed and built to withstand the impact of more than one jet airliner.
Some say that the steel beams couldn’t survive the extra-special heat generated by that super-duper flammable liquid called “jet fuel”. They don’t point out that “jet fuel” is simply kerosene. (This tells me that they are either contemptibly, disgustingly, and inexcusably ignorant or psychopathically dishonest.) The kerosene burned up very quickly and had little effect on the steel beams. And the third building to fall wasn’t hit by a plane.
The firemen that were in the first building that collapsed weren’t worried. They said on the radio that the fire could be easily knocked down. New York City firemen know about fires in skyscrapers. They believed that skyscrapers don’t collapse because of fire. And they were right.
Although there have been quite a few fires in skyscrapers around the world, none of those buildings collapsed as a result. And yet we are expected to believe that three skyscrapers collapsed on the same day because of relatively small fires. Anyone who believes that will believe absolutely anything that the System tells him. He will start believing that 2 + 2 = 5 as soon as the System starts saying that.
Popular Mechanics magazine is credited with inducing the American sheeple to believe that the absurd “pancaking theory” explains how the two towers were able to collapse at near free-fall speed and turn to dust. And who was the “senior researcher” for that article? Someone named Benjamin Chertoff. Yes, a relative of Michael Chertoff. (If the floors had pancaked, the massive central steel columns would have remained standing.)
The January 2002 issue of Fire Engineering magazine characterized the FEMA investigation of the collapse of the three buildings as “a half-baked farce”. Eric Hufschmid: “Later that month, both Bush and Cheney asked Tom Dashiell to ‘limit the investigation’. Apparently, a half-baked farce was more of an investigation than Bush and Cheney wanted. I suppose they would have preferred a quarter-baked farce.”
Eric Hufschmid: “During April, 2002 the final bits of rubble from the World Trade Center were removed. The thick pieces of steel were sold to foreign nations as scrap metal and at a very low price, while the less valuable pieces were shipped by barge to be buried…. The editor of Fire Engineering wrote months earlier that this destruction of rubble is illegal. He pointed out that our laws demand that rubble be saved from major disasters so that we can learn what happened and improve our buildings and fire prevention techniques. Our government violated the law when it destroyed the rubble from the World Trade Center.”
After the FBI-engineered bomb attack in 1993 (the FBI ordered their paid informant to build a fully functional bomb for the terrorists; 6 people were killed; hundreds were injured; the monsters in the FBI were not even prosecuted), bomb-sniffing dogs were added to the security system of the towers. On September 6, 2001, five days before the demolition of the buildings, the dogs were inexplicably removed.
Employees who were in the sub-basements of the North Tower say that they heard and felt explosions before an aircraft hit either tower.
If the buildings had not conveniently collapsed on that day, if they had merely been damaged, it would have been illegal to use controlled demolition to remove them. The buildings were full of asbestos. Before the buildings were eliminated, the Twin Towers had become liabilities. “The Port Authority was looking at an asbestos-abatement bill of as much as 1 billion dollars.”
Let’s perform a thought experiment. We have two identical 100-story steel-framed skyscrapers. Using our magical powers, we remove the lowest 75 stories of the first building, leaving the top 25 stories untouched. At the same instant, we remove only 5 contiguous stories from the second building, leaving the lowest 70 stories and the highest 25 stories untouched. At that instant, the 25-story tops of both buildings are poised in mid-air, ready to fall. However, the first has only air between it and the ground, while the second has 5 stories of air followed by 70 stories of steel-framed skyscraper. The tops of the two buildings begin to fall. Which do you think is going to hit the ground first? Don’t you think that it will take a lot longer for the second one to hit the ground (if it hits the ground at all)? And yet, the Twin Towers fell at virtually free-fall speed.
We have video showing molten steel flowing from one of the Twin Towers before either had collapsed.
Virtually all of the concrete in the floors of the Twin Towers was pulverized (converted to dust) before the floors even hit the ground. Doing that required a tremendous amount of energy, energy for which there is no evident source.
Some of the concrete was melted. How was a temperature high enough to do that generated?
So what is the System’s explanation for the magical way that the towers were able virtually to collapse at free-fall speed and turn to dust? They cannot give an explanation. They don’t even pretend to. NIST’s 10,000 page report discusses only the initiation of the collapses. A footnote on page 82 states that the report “does not actually include the structural behavior of the tower after the conditions for collapse initiation were reached and collapse became inevitable.”
In May 2002, FEMA released its report on the collapse of the buildings. We read: “The specifics of the fires in Building 7 and how they caused the building to collapse remain unknown at this time.”
Dr. Paul Craig Roberts: “It is a non-controversial fact that the official explanation of the collapse of the WTC buildings is false.”
Richard Gage, founder of Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth: ” … more than 1500 architects and engineers … are calling for a new investigation into the destruction of these three World Trade Center high-rises.”
Orwell: “Who controls the past … controls the future: who controls the present controls the past.”
Revilo P. Oliver: “Professor Goldman … claimed that he and ‘most historians’ regarded history as a ‘weapon’ to be used for ‘determining people’s ideas and attitudes.'”
Hear Frederick C. Blackburn explain to Jan Lamprecht why the alleged cell-phone calls were impossible:
archive.org/details/911theimpossiblecellphonecallsotherjewishliescrimes1_202003
A masterful shredding of the System’s 9-11 lies:
“9-11: The New Pearl Harbor”
archive.org/details/September11TheNewPearlHarbor
Jan Lamprecht introduces and shows a video by Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth:
archive.org/details/911architectsexpertsexplosions1_202002
“Painful Deceptions” by Eric Hufschmid:
archive.org/details/scm-23198-painfuldeceptions-part1of2
archive.org/details/scm-23202-painfuldeceptions-part2of2
The truth about the Apollo hoax:
archive.org/details/DidWeLandOnTheMoon
archive.org/details/EndgameVostfr
archive.org/details/WeNeverWentToTheMoon_201511
archive.org/details/RalphReneRawInterview
archive.org/details/Season2Episode8BartSibrel
archive.org/details/BartSibrelMoonMyths
archive.org/details/WasItOnlyAPaperMoonApolloHoaxJamesM.Collier1997
archive.org/details/MoonHoaxBuzzSaysHeDidntGoToTheMoon
There are so many impossibilities in NASA’s absurd tale that anyone who can think for himself will see that it is a lie.
However, most of the sheeple don’t want the truth; it’s too painful.
Here’s one impossibility.
The Swedish designer of the camera that Armstrong and Aldrin allegedly used on the moon says that it had no lead shielding; it was merely “painted silver”. And yet the pictures were not fogged at all by the high level of radiation found on the moon. Absolutely absurd.
None of the pictures showed any stars in the sky. And of course it is absurd to say that no photographs of stars were taken because NASA couldn’t afford a tripod or a camera capable of taking time-exposures. They could spend millions of dollars for a “lunar rover”, but they couldn’t afford a device that could photograph stars.
Here’s another.
The lens of the camera used by Aldrin and Armstrong was made so that several cross-hairs or reticles would be superimposed on every photograph. The cross-hair in the center was larger than the others. In one of the pictures, the largest cross-hair was clearly not in the center of the photograph.
Here’s another.
It is evident that fill-in lights were used for some of the pictures. Any expert photographer will tell you that. Even the Swedish designer of the camera that was used says that he cannot explain how those pictures could have been made without a fill-in light. And yet NASA says that no fill-in lights were used.
Here’s another.
Many of the “moon photos” show shadows on the ground that are not parallel. This means that the light source was not the sun. Sunlight produces on a relatively flat, level surface shadows that are parallel.
Here’s another.
At the press conference after their alleged return from the moon, Armstrong and Aldrin said that when they were on the surface of the moon they could not see any stars. They pretended that they were surprised that anyone would think that stars would be visible from the moon.
We have their word on it. There are no stars to be seen in space. Anyone who believes that is not even human.
Think of the darkest, clearest night that you can remember when you looked up at the sky and saw the stars. Now think of how blazingly bright those stars would be when seen from the surface of the moon, where there would be no atmosphere and no dust between you and the stars.
If the astronots had actually been on the moon, they could have faced away from the sun, lifted the reflective visors of their helmets, looked upward, and seen a stunning array of brilliant stars.
Here’s another.
Although the astronauts allegedly left innumerable footprints on the moon, although NASA presented videos of the wheels of “lunar rovers” throwing dust into the air, not one of the six alleged “lunar landers” created a blast crater when it allegedly landed. Not one of the six alleged landers created a depression or disturbed the surface in any way whatsoever with its exhaust jet. Although these rockets allegedly had a thrust measured in thousands of pounds, they were unable even to melt or char the moon’s surface. No dust settled on any of the landing pads of the six alleged landers.
What does that tell those of us who can think? It tells us that those “landers” didn’t land; they were carried to their locations here on earth.
Here’s another.
The video footage allegedly showing the blast-off of the “lunar lander” after the “moon landing” was over shows absolutely no exhaust plume. There should have been a massive, opaque plume.
What does that tell those of us who can think? It tells us that those “landers” didn’t blast off on the moon; they were lifted up here on earth.
Here’s another.
One of NASA’s “moon photos” shows several footprints made by the astronots’ boots. However, it also shows part of a footprint made by a tennis shoe.
Here’s another.
At the beach, one can leave clear and distinct footprints in wet sand, but not in completely dry sand. Because of the perfect vacuum, the surface of the moon is bone dry. And yet the astronots were able to make perfectly formed footprints.
Here’s another.
One of the infamous “moon photos” shows that one of the “moon rocks” has the letter C on it and the ground adjacent to the rock has the letter C on it.
Here’s another.
The amount of radiation that the astronots received (especially in the Van Allen Belts) was many times the amount needed to kill a human. Yet they did not die or even become ill. Their spacecraft had no shielding against radiation; in fact, the walls were so thin and weak that they could not withstand normal atmospheric pressure.
Here’s another.
During a space-shuttle flight that went higher than its predecessors (although it was far below the Van Allen Belts), the astronauts said that they could see sparks caused by radiation with their eyes shut. CNN reported that this flight revealed that the radiation belts are more dangerous than previously believed. How could that shuttle flight provide any information about the Van Allen Belts that had not already been provided by the seven Apollo flights that allegedly went through those belts? That seems impossible. What does seem possible, even certain, is that Apollo was just another of ZOG’s lies.
Here’s another.
We are told that men walked on the moon in pressurized spacesuits. And yet those men were able effortlessly to bend their arms, legs, and fingers.
Here’s another.
NASA provided a video clip of an astronot driving a golf ball on the moon. Later, they replaced it with a different clip of an astronot hitting a ball because the first one showed that the ball was sliced. (Slicing cannot happen in a vacuum, and a baseball pitcher cannot throw a curve ball in a vacuum.)
Astronot “cavorting on the moon”: “It’s absolutely unreal!”
Here’s another.
We have two video clips that slipped through NASA’s fingers. They both show Apollo astronauts in low orbit around the earth pretending to be halfway to the moon. In one, they darkened the interior of the craft, moved several feet away from a round window that was filled by a view of the earth’s surface, and pointed the camera at the window. The dark interior of the craft surrounding the window was supposed to be the blackness of space surrounding the distant earth.
Why did they ever have to pretend that they were halfway to the moon? Because they were never halfway to the moon. The whole thing was a hoax.
Here’s another.
As soon as the Apollo farce ended, NASA dumped the Saturn V rocket. A new rocket was developed and used to launch the space shuttle. If the Saturn V had been used instead, the first shuttle would have been launched five years sooner and the cost per launch would have been reduced by two thirds. The problem was that the Saturn V was a fraud; it had nowhere near the performance claimed for it.
And on and on and on.
The day after Grissom and 2 other astronauts were murdered by the System, FBI thugs entered Grissom’s home and stole the reports about Apollo that he had written; those reports were never returned to his widow.
NASA inspector Thomas Ronald Baron, who had written a 500-page report detailing the incompetence of NASA and North American Aviation, testified before the congressional committee that was investigating the disaster (Grissom’s immolation). Four days later, he, his wife, and his daughter were killed when his automobile was struck by a train. In violation of Florida law, not one of them was autopsied. His 500-page report disappeared.
Bill Kaysing: “The Atlas engine, which was developed at Rocketdyne, was used … to propel the Atlas intercontinental ballistic missile. However, it didn’t work too well. In fact, at one point 14 Atlas [missiles] … exploded consecutively at Vandenburg Airforce Base. They blew up in the air, downrange, on the pad. So the Atlas engine reliability was very low. And this, of course, gave me a very dim view of space, space travel, rockets in general. The Atlas engine was a small version of the F1 engine that was used in the Saturn V for the alleged trips to the moon.”
Bill Kaysing: “Bill Wood is a rocket scientist; he’s been in the business for 25 years…. Well, one point that Bill brought out was that the Saturn V vehicle, using five F1 engines, really was not the configuration that was shown in films of the Saturn V leaving for the moon. Instead, it’s Bill’s contention that they used less powerful engines and simply added fuel to the jet stream to make it appear as though the Saturn V was using five F1 engines. Well, the reason was that the F1 engine, which was tested at Edwards Airforce Base, suffered from a problem in large liquid rocket propellent engines of combustion instability…. [S]hock waves are set up inside the expansion chamber of the rocket, and they resonate and embellish one another until finally the rocket chamber explodes.”
Bill Kaysing: “Apollos 1 through 6 were all failures, dreadful failures. They blew up on the pad, they blew up 50 feet in the air. Apollo 6, the last one in which I think we had truthful data, was a total fiasco. It took off; second stage didn’t ignite; everything went wrong that could go wrong…. From Apollo 7 on, they decided to falsify information, and that’s what they did.”
Bill Kaysing: “In 1959, I was working with advanced research at Rocketdyne, and their own studies proved that radiation levels on the moon were lethal. This corroborated Russian research. The Russians claimed that for a man to survive on the moon with the radiation emitted from solar and cosmic sources, he would have to be shielded by four feet of solid lead.”
Bill Kaysing: “The sounds of engines run up in excess of 150 decibels. This is far beyond the capability of anybody to converse when you have sound at that high level. Now the engines inside the lunar module—both the descent engine and the ascent engine—emitted this type of noise, and yet in broadcasts from the moon we hear the astronauts conversing in a normal tone of voice and saying things like ‘Quiet ride.'”
Bill Kaysing: “On December 7th, 1975, I was invited to discuss my book at radio station KOME in San Jose, California…. About halfway through the broadcast, the engineer came into the … room … , and he said, ‘We’re off the air.’ Subsequent investigation indicated that someone in a helicopter had dropped napalm on the KOME transmitter in the Gilroy Hills, causing a quarter of a million dollars worth of damage and effectively cutting off the station from the air for three days.”
Bill Kaysing: “After [Neil Armstrong] allegedly returned from the moon, he gradually became more and more reclusive. Today, he will not talk about Apollo with anybody under any circumstances.”
Bill Kaysing: ” … in August of 1991, James Irwin [Apollo 15] called me at my home, and he said, ‘I understand you’ve written a book called “We Never Went to the Moon”.’ He said, ‘Come to think of it, this phone could be tapped.’ He said, ‘I want you to call me at my home on Friday.’ … So I said, ‘OK, Jim; I’ll call you,’ and he gave me his home phone number. Well, when I called him on Friday, James Irwin was dead; he had died of a heart attack.”
Bill Kaysing: “Paul Jacobs was a top investigator in San Francisco. I went to see him to get his help. I said, ‘Paul, help me with my Apollo hoax project.’ He says, ‘All right, I will. I’m flying to Washington next week; I’ll go see the head of the U. S. Department of Geology,’ and he did. And he asked the geologist, ‘Did you examine the moon rocks? Did they really come from the moon?’ The geologist just laughed. Well, there’s a sad ending to this story. Paul flew back from Washington, I met with him again in San Francisco, and he told me that he had determined that the Apollo project was a hoax and that people at high levels were keeping it a secret. Unfortunately, Paul and his wife died of cancer within 90 days.”
Revilo P. Oliver: “Professor Goldman … claimed that he and ‘most historians’ regarded history as a ‘weapon’ to be used for ‘determining people’s ideas and attitudes.'”
Bart Sibrel: ” … von Braun … said that once you landed on the moon, you’d have to immediately go into a cave to protect yourself from micro-meteorites…. He said there would be a 50% chance of a catastrophic failure every 24 hours from micro-meteorites.”
Bart Sibrel: “Kelly Smith from NASA went on camera about four years ago and said that the radiation belt surrounding the earth which is about 750 miles above the space station—he said it’s dangerous and we must first learn how to protect astronauts from this radiation before we can send people through this region of space…. And then they launched the Orion spacecraft about three years ago with geiger counters to go into this radiation field … they come back with two geiger counters and I say can I please have those readings and they say, no, that information is classified…. [W]hy is that amount of radiation classified? Because if they told you, it would prove that the astronauts couldn’t possibly go through it and survive.” [If Apollo astronots went through the belts 14 times, why did Orion have to measure the radiation levels?]
Professor James A. Van Allen: “The acceptance of such grandiose proposals by otherwise rational individuals stems from the mystique of space flight, as nurtured over many centuries by early writers of science fiction and their present-day counterparts. Indeed, to the ordinary person space flight is synonymous with the flight of human beings. The simple taste for adventure and fantasy expressed in that sentiment has been elevated in some quarters to the quasi-religious belief that space is a natural habitat of human beings.”
Did you hear what the discoverer of the Van Allen Radiation Belts said? The idea of sending men to the moon is a “grandiose” “fantasy”.
Revilo P. Oliver: “Professor Van Allen lists sixteen projects of the highest scientific importance and one that is merely utilitarian which were aborted or crippled by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration in 1981 so that funds for them could be diverted to the construction of the ‘space shuttle,’ which, at enormous expense, chiefly benefited newsmen and the operators of boob-tubes, and produced virtually no increment of either scientific knowledge or usable technology. One has only to look at the list to see that a vast amount of highly important knowledge about the solar system, the universe, and even the earth itself was prevented or indefinitely postponed, just to give a few men an adventurous and exciting joy ride and to fascinate the audience that stares at television screens in a semi-hypnotic trance.“
Another way that the ZOG system lies.
Paul Craig Roberts (“Sidney Powell’s Plea Bargain”):
“Plea bargaining … arose because prosecutors are more interested in their conviction rate than they are in innocence or guilt…. prosecutors have gained the power to withhold exculpatory evidence from the defendant and to bribe other defendants with reduced sentences or with money to testify falsely against the target defendant….
“[P]rosecutors … bring charges for which they have little or no evidence. The public presumes that the prosecutor has a case, and the prosecutor uses the media to create a presumption of guilt….
“When the defendant is worn down and loses all hope of a fair, or affordable, trial, a deal is brokered.
“When the defendant, his attorney, and the prosecutor stand before the judge, the judge asks for assurance that the plea was voluntary and no deals prompted it, and he is given assurance. Judges, clerks, defense attorneys, persecutors, and the defendant all are parties to the lie….
“Under a plea bargaining regime, law is no longer a shield of the people. It is a weapon against the people in the hands of government.”